↓ Skip to main content

INFECTION AND DISSEMINATION OF DENGUE VIRUS TYPE 2 IN AEDES AEGYPTI, AEDES ALBOPICTUS, AND AEDES SCUTELLARIS FROM THE TORRES STRAIT, AUSTRALIA

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
INFECTION AND DISSEMINATION OF DENGUE VIRUS TYPE 2 IN AEDES AEGYPTI, AEDES ALBOPICTUS, AND AEDES SCUTELLARIS FROM THE TORRES STRAIT, AUSTRALIA
Published in
Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, December 2007
DOI 10.2987/5598.1
Pubmed ID
Authors

PETER R. MOORE, PETRINA H. JOHNSON, GREG A. SMITH, SCOTT A. RITCHIE, ANDREW F. VAN DEN HURK

Abstract

To determine their relative roles in transmission of dengue virus (DENV) in the Torres Strait region of northern Australia, we examined infection and dissemination of a sympatric strain of dengue virus type 2 (DENV-2) in Aedes scutellaris, Ae. albopictus, and Ae. aegypti. In experiments using membrane feeders for virus exposure, infection rates were 83% and 43% for Ae. scutellaris and Ae. aegypti, respectively. Salivary gland infection rates for both species were 43%. In experiments using pledgets for virus exposure, infection rates for Ae. aegypti, Ae. scutellaris, and Ae. albopictus were 68%, 55%, and 37%, respectively. Aedes albopictus exhibited the greatest barriers to infection with only 7% tested developing a salivary gland infection, compared to 42% and 24% of Ae. aegypti and Ae. scutellaris, respectively. These results suggest that Ae. scutellaris may have been responsible for DENV transmission on Torres Strait islands, where Ae. aegypti does not occur. In contrast, Ae. albopictus may not be an important vector of DENV-2 from the Torres Strait.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 67 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 29%
Student > Master 10 14%
Other 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 15%
Environmental Science 4 6%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 8 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2015.
All research outputs
#8,783,469
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,361
of 169,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them