You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multicenter Core Laboratory Comparison of the Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Resting Pd/Pa With Fractional Flow Reserve The RESOLVE Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.060 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Allen Jeremias, Akiko Maehara, Philippe Généreux, Kaleab N. Asrress, Colin Berry, Bernard De Bruyne, Justin E. Davies, Javier Escaned, William F. Fearon, K. Lance Gould, Nils P. Johnson, Ajay J. Kirtane, Bon-Kwon Koo, Koen M. Marques, Sukhjinder Nijjer, Keith G. Oldroyd, Ricardo Petraco, Jan J. Piek, Nico H. Pijls, Simon Redwood, Maria Siebes, Jos A.E. Spaan, Marcel van 't Veer, Gary S. Mintz, Gregg W. Stone |
| Abstract |
This study sought to examine the diagnostic accuracy of the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and resting distal coronary artery pressure/aortic pressure (Pd/Pa) with respect to hyperemic fractional flow reserve (FFR) in a core laboratory-based multicenter collaborative study. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | 25% |
| Argentina | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 203 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 38 | 18% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 19% |
| Unknown | 51 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 104 | 50% |
| Engineering | 14 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 70 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,422,700
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#4,921
of 16,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,248
of 228,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#53
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.