↓ Skip to main content

Resistance to eye opening in patients with disorders of consciousness

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resistance to eye opening in patients with disorders of consciousness
Published in
Journal of Neurology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00415-018-8849-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hjalmar Jochem van Ommen, Aurore Thibaut, Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse, Lizette Heine, Vanessa Charland-Verville, Sarah Wannez, Olivier Bodart, Steven Laureys, Olivia Gosseries

Abstract

Resistance to eye opening (REO) is a commonly encountered phenomenon in clinical practice. We aim to investigate whether REO is a sign of consciousness or a reflex in severely brain-injured patients. We recorded REO in chronic patients with disorders of consciousness during a multimodal diagnostic assessment. REO evaluations were performed daily in each patient and clinical diagnosis of unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), minimally conscious state with (MCS+) or without (MCS-) preserved language processing was made using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Out of 150 consecutive patients, 79 patients fit inclusion criteria. REO was seen in 19 patients (24.1%). At the group level, there was a significant relationship between the presence of REO and the level of consciousness. We also observed a difference in the repeatability of REO between patients in UWS, MCS- and MCS+. Out of 23 patients in UWS, six showed REO, in whom five showed atypical brain patterns activation. Our findings suggest a voluntary basis for REO and stress the need for multiple serial assessments of REO in these patients, especially since most patients show fluctuating levels of consciousness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 9 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 12 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 24%
Computer Science 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2018.
All research outputs
#14,387,654
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,037
of 4,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,124
of 329,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#55
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.