↓ Skip to main content

Spectral and photometric studies of the Wolf-Rayet star WR 134 = HD 191765

Overview of attention for article published in Astronomy Reports, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spectral and photometric studies of the Wolf-Rayet star WR 134 = HD 191765
Published in
Astronomy Reports, October 2012
DOI 10.1134/s1063772912100058
Authors

D. N. Rustamov, A. M. Cherepashchuk

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Astronomy Reports
#101
of 259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,967
of 173,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Astronomy Reports
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 259 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them