↓ Skip to main content

SPARTA+: a modest improvement in empirical NMR chemical shift prediction by means of an artificial neural network

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomolecular NMR, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
457 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
330 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SPARTA+: a modest improvement in empirical NMR chemical shift prediction by means of an artificial neural network
Published in
Journal of Biomolecular NMR, July 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10858-010-9433-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yang Shen, Ad Bax

Abstract

NMR chemical shifts provide important local structural information for proteins and are key in recently described protein structure generation protocols. We describe a new chemical shift prediction program, SPARTA+, which is based on artificial neural networking. The neural network is trained on a large carefully pruned database, containing 580 proteins for which high-resolution X-ray structures and nearly complete backbone and (13)C(beta) chemical shifts are available. The neural network is trained to establish quantitative relations between chemical shifts and protein structures, including backbone and side-chain conformation, H-bonding, electric fields and ring-current effects. The trained neural network yields rapid chemical shift prediction for backbone and (13)C(beta) atoms, with standard deviations of 2.45, 1.09, 0.94, 1.14, 0.25 and 0.49 ppm for delta(15)N, delta(13)C', delta(13)C(alpha), delta(13)C(beta), delta(1)H(alpha) and delta(1)H(N), respectively, between the SPARTA+ predicted and experimental shifts for a set of eleven validation proteins. These results represent a modest but consistent improvement (2-10%) over the best programs available to date, and appear to be approaching the limit at which empirical approaches can predict chemical shifts.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 330 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 309 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 96 29%
Researcher 83 25%
Student > Bachelor 25 8%
Student > Master 22 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 5%
Other 45 14%
Unknown 43 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 102 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 63 19%
Engineering 9 3%
Physics and Astronomy 7 2%
Other 24 7%
Unknown 59 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2014.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomolecular NMR
#146
of 580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,579
of 109,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomolecular NMR
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 580 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them