You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparison of methods for sampling the deer tick,Ixodes dammini, in a Lyme disease endemic area
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Experimental and Applied Acarology, May 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01219108 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard C. Falco, Durland Fish |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 131 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 22% |
| Researcher | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Professor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 64 | 47% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 10 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,983,982
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Experimental and Applied Acarology
#87
of 914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,377
of 19,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental and Applied Acarology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 914 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them