↓ Skip to main content

Ruthenium-based chemotherapeutics: are they ready for prime time?

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
9 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
415 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
437 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ruthenium-based chemotherapeutics: are they ready for prime time?
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00280-010-1293-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Ashkan Emadi

Abstract

Since the discovery of cis-platinum, many transition metal complexes have been synthesized and assayed for antineoplastic activity. In recent years, ruthenium-based molecules have emerged as promising antitumor and antimetastatic agents with potential uses in platinum-resistant tumors or as alternatives to platinum. Ruthenium compounds theoretically possess unique biochemical features allowing them to accumulate preferentially in neoplastic tissues and to convert to their active state only after entering tumor cells. Intriguingly, some ruthenium agents show significant activity against cancer metastases but have minimal effects on primary tumors. Two ruthenium-based drugs, NAMI-A and KP1019, have reached human clinical testing. This review will highlight the chemical properties, mechanism of action, preclinical data, and early phase clinical results of these two lead ruthenium compounds. Other promising ruthenium agents will also be reviewed with emphasis on the novel ruthenium compound ONCO4417, and DW1/2 that has demonstrated Pim-1 kinase inhibition in preclinical systems. Further development of these and other ruthenium agents may rely on novel approaches including rational combination strategies as well as identification of potential pharmacodynamic biomarkers of drug activity aiding early phase clinical studies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 437 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Bahrain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 422 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 91 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 18%
Student > Master 73 17%
Researcher 30 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 4%
Other 53 12%
Unknown 93 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 241 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 <1%
Other 19 4%
Unknown 109 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,609,499
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#68
of 2,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,890
of 95,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,501 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.