↓ Skip to main content

A Musculoskeletal Profile of Elite Female Soccer Players

Overview of attention for article published in HSS Journal®, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Musculoskeletal Profile of Elite Female Soccer Players
Published in
HSS Journal®, September 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11420-009-9108-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Theresa A. Chiaia, Robert A. Maschi, Robyn M. Stuhr, Jennifer R. Rogers, Monique A. Sheridan, Lisa R. Callahan, Jo A. Hannafin

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify lower-extremity (LE) musculoskeletal characteristics of elite female soccer players and to determine whether differences between dominant and nondominant extremities exist with respect to strength, flexibility, and range of motion. Physical data were collected from 26 female professional soccer players. Core control, hip and knee passive range of motion (PROM), LE flexibility, hip abductor strength, and dynamic functional alignment were assessed for each LE. Of 26 subjects, 21 scored 2/5 or less on core control. Mean hip internal rotation and external rotation were 33 degrees (+/-8 degrees) and 25 degrees (+/-6.7 degrees), respectively. All subjects had shortened two-joint hip flexors with an average knee flexion angle of 50 degrees (+/-11 degrees) and increased femoral anteversion. Forty one of 48 dominant limbs and 42 of 48 nondominant limbs demonstrated deviations from neutral alignment during step down or single-leg squat. Of 25 subjects, 15 demonstrated a stiff-knee landing and/or takeoff. All subjects demonstrated limitations in hip external rotation PROM and hip flexor length. There was no difference between dominant and nondominant LEs in all variables including hip abductor strength. Additional research is needed to determine if there is a correlation between the musculoskeletal characteristics, LE biomechanics, and potential risk for injury.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 94 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Master 15 15%
Researcher 8 8%
Other 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 24 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 31 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 23 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2015.
All research outputs
#22,963,239
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from HSS Journal®
#472
of 499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,713
of 102,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HSS Journal®
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.