↓ Skip to main content

3D printing of soft lithography mold for rapid production of polydimethylsiloxane-based microfluidic devices for cell stimulation with concentration gradients

Overview of attention for article published in Biomedical Microdevices, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
312 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
3D printing of soft lithography mold for rapid production of polydimethylsiloxane-based microfluidic devices for cell stimulation with concentration gradients
Published in
Biomedical Microdevices, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10544-015-9928-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ken-ichiro Kamei, Yasumasa Mashimo, Yoshie Koyama, Christopher Fockenberg, Miyuki Nakashima, Minako Nakajima, Junjun Li, Yong Chen

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is advantageous over conventional technologies for the fabrication of sophisticated structures such as 3D micro-channels for future applications in tissue engineering and drug screening. We aimed to apply this technology to cell-based assays using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), the most commonly used material for fabrication of micro-channels used for cell culture experiments. Useful properties of PDMS include biocompatibility, gas permeability and transparency. We developed a simple and robust protocol to generate PDMS-based devices using a soft lithography mold produced by 3D printing. 3D chemical gradients were then generated to stimulate cells confined to a micro-channel. We demonstrate that concentration gradients of growth factors, important regulators of cell/tissue functions in vivo, influence the survival and growth of human embryonic stem cells. Thus, this approach for generation of 3D concentration gradients could have strong implications for tissue engineering and drug screening.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 308 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 20%
Student > Master 55 18%
Researcher 45 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 7%
Student > Bachelor 23 7%
Other 33 11%
Unknown 70 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 99 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 8%
Materials Science 19 6%
Chemistry 16 5%
Other 42 13%
Unknown 82 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2016.
All research outputs
#13,354,251
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Microdevices
#508
of 747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,692
of 255,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Microdevices
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 747 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.