↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of several FDG PET parameters for prediction of soft tissue tumour grade at primary diagnosis and recurrence

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of several FDG PET parameters for prediction of soft tissue tumour grade at primary diagnosis and recurrence
Published in
European Radiology, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00330-015-3654-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wolfgang P. Fendler, Rebecca P. Chalkidis, Harun Ilhan, Thomas Knösel, Ken Herrmann, Rolf D. Issels, Peter Bartenstein, Clemens C. Cyran, Lars H. Lindner, Marcus Hacker

Abstract

This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of SUV-based parameters derived from [(18) F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in order to optimize non-invasive prediction of soft tissue tumour (STT) grade.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 33%
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 83%
Unspecified 1 6%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2015.
All research outputs
#20,262,276
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#3,294
of 4,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,945
of 255,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#45
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,114 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.