↓ Skip to main content

Characteristics of Out-of-Care Patients Who Required a Referral for Re-engagement Services by Public Health Bridge Counselors Following a Brief Clinic-Based Retention Intervention

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characteristics of Out-of-Care Patients Who Required a Referral for Re-engagement Services by Public Health Bridge Counselors Following a Brief Clinic-Based Retention Intervention
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10461-018-2110-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nada Fadul, Sarah J. Willis, Jenna Donovan, Aimee Wilkin, Amy Durr Heine, Anna LeViere, Ciarra Dortche, Evelyn Byrd Quinlivan

Abstract

The NC-LINK Project initiated both clinic-based retention services and state public health bridge counselor-based (SBCs) re-engagement services to retain and re-engage people living with HIV infection (PLWH) in care. The goal of this project is to compare efforts between clinic-based retention and SBC re-engagement services to determine whether patients are more or less likely to remain in HIV care services. Clinic appointment data were used to identify patients who were last seen more than 6-9 months prior. Patients either received clinic-based retention services only or were subsequently referred to the SBC re-engagement intervention if the retention services were unsuccessful. The frequency of re-engagement in care (180 days) and HIV suppression (VLS, within 1 year) was examined for patients in these two groups. The SBC group was less likely to have VLS at the visit prior to referral (adjusted OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.53, 2.72). Patients who were referred to the SBC were less likely to re-engage in care within 180 days as compared to those who received clinic-based retention services only (adjusted OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.21, 0.41).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 15%
Unspecified 3 12%
Librarian 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 11 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Unspecified 3 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 8%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,915,093
of 24,228,883 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#2,432
of 3,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,869
of 332,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#54
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,228,883 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.