You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Why the Long Face? Kangaroos and Wallabies Follow the Same ‘Rule’ of Cranial Evolutionary Allometry (CREA) as Placentals
|
---|---|
Published in |
Evolutionary Biology, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11692-015-9308-9 |
Authors |
Andrea Cardini, David Polly, Rebekah Dawson, Nick Milne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 71 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 20% |
Researcher | 14 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
Professor | 5 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 19% |
Unknown | 14 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 49% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 11% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 16 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2015.
All research outputs
#18,401,176
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Biology
#260
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,601
of 358,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Biology
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.