You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
STED nanoscopy: a glimpse into the future
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell and Tissue Research, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00441-015-2146-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paolo Bianchini, Chiara Peres, Michele Oneto, Silvia Galiani, Giuseppe Vicidomini, Alberto Diaspro |
| Abstract |
The well-known saying of "Seeing is believing" became even more apt in biology when stimulated emission depletion (STED) nanoscopy was introduced in 1994 by the Nobel laureate S. Hell and coworkers. We presently stand at a juncture. Nanoscopy represented a revolution in fluorescence microscopy but now is a mature technique applied to many branches of biology, physics, chemistry, and materials science. We are currently looking ahead to the next generation of optical nanoscopes, to the new key player that will arise in the forthcoming years. This article gives an overview of the various cutting-edge implementations of STED nanoscopy and tries to shine a light into the future: imaging everything faster with unprecedented sensitivity and label-free. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 131 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 26% |
| Researcher | 25 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 24 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 15 | 11% |
| Engineering | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 31 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,734,701
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Research
#230
of 2,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,198
of 261,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Research
#6
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,285 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.