↓ Skip to main content

Structural Characterization and Disulfide Assignment of Spider Peptide Phα1β by Mass Spectrometry

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structural Characterization and Disulfide Assignment of Spider Peptide Phα1β by Mass Spectrometry
Published in
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13361-018-1904-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly L. Wormwood, Armand Gatien Ngounou Wetie, Marcus Vinicius Gomez, Yue Ju, Paul Kowalski, Marius Mihasan, Costel C. Darie

Abstract

Native Phα1β is a peptide purified from the venom of the armed spider Phoneutria nigriventer that has been shown to have an extensive analgesic effect with fewer side effects than ω-conotoxin MVIIA. Recombinant Phα1β mimics the effects of the native Phα1β. Because of this, it has been suggested that Phα1β may have potential to be used as a therapeutic for controlling persistent pathological pain. The amino acid sequence of Phα1β is known; however, the exact structure and disulfide arrangement has yet to be determined. Determination of the disulfide linkages and exact structure could greatly assist in pharmacological analysis and determination of why this peptide is such an effective analgesic. Here, we used biochemical and mass spectrometry approaches to determine the disulfide linkages present in the recombinant Phα1β peptide. Using a combination of MALDI-MS, direct infusion ESI-MS, and nanoLC-MS/MS analysis of the undigested recombinant Phα1β peptide and digested with AspN, trypsin, or AspN/trypsin, we were able to identify and confirm all six disulfide linkages present in the peptide as Cys1-2, Cys3-4, Cys5-6, Cys7-8, Cys9-10, and Cys11-12. These results were also partially confirmed in the native Phα1β peptide. These experiments provide essential structural information about Phα1β and may assist in providing insight into the peptide's analgesic effect with very low side effects. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 22%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Chemistry 2 11%
Unspecified 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#3,086
of 3,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,251
of 324,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#63
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,835 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.