You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hormone therapy for preventing cardiovascular disease in post‐menopausal women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002229.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Henry MP Boardman, Louise Hartley, Anne Eisinga, Caroline Main, Marta Roqué i Figuls, Xavier Bonfill Cosp, Rafael Gabriel Sanchez, Beatrice Knight |
| Abstract |
Evidence from systematic reviews of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women, however the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have had mixed results. This is an updated version of a Cochrane review published in 2013. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 18% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| Australia | 3 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 22 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 66% |
| Scientists | 9 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 638 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 626 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 88 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 79 | 12% |
| Researcher | 68 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 60 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 38 | 6% |
| Other | 124 | 19% |
| Unknown | 181 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 232 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 64 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 3% |
| Psychology | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 71 | 11% |
| Unknown | 215 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 253. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#149,790
of 25,856,138 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#266
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,589
of 275,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.