↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and feasibility of cyclophosphamide combined with intermediate- dose or high-dose cytarabine for relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and feasibility of cyclophosphamide combined with intermediate- dose or high-dose cytarabine for relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00432-014-1666-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ulf Schnetzke, Peter Fix, Baerbel Spies-Weisshart, Karin Schrenk, Anita Glaser, Hans-Joerg Fricke, Paul La Rosée, Andreas Hochhaus, Sebastian Scholl

Abstract

Approximately, 70 % of adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) achieve a complete remission (CR) while 10-20 % of AML are refractory to induction chemotherapy. Furthermore, a significant proportion of AML patients in CR will relapse during or after consolidation treatment. There is no evidence for a standard salvage regimen and most centers use a combination of an anthracycline and cytarabine (AraC). The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of two age-adjusted regimens containing AraC and cyclophosphamide applied for the treatment of relapsed or refractory AML.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 21%
Researcher 5 21%
Other 4 17%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 46%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2014.
All research outputs
#21,162,249
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#2,053
of 2,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,024
of 228,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#27
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.