↓ Skip to main content

Pulmonary cement embolism is not associated with the cause of death in a post-mortem cohort of cement-augmented interventions in the spine

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pulmonary cement embolism is not associated with the cause of death in a post-mortem cohort of cement-augmented interventions in the spine
Published in
European Spine Journal, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00586-018-5581-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian Butscheidt, Tim Rolvien, Jakob Ritter, Axel Heinemann, Hermann Vogel, Michael Amling, Klaus Püschel

Abstract

Complications of cement-augmented interventions (e.g., kyphoplasty) in the spine include local cement leakage and pulmonary cement embolisms (PCE). This study was conducted to determine their extent in a unique post-mortem cohort. Retrospective analysis of post-mortem whole-body CT scans and review of autopsy results in 29 consecutive cases with cement-augmented interventions in the spine. PCE findings were graded based on cement deposits: grade 0 (no PCE), grade 1 (1-3 PCE), grade 2 (4-6 PCE), and grade 3 (> 6 or branch-shaped PCE). Bone and lung tissue specimens were obtained in representative cases to confirm the findings histologically. Local cement leakage was detected in 69%: intravenous (34%), intervertebral (31%), intraspinal (14%), and retrograde (17%). Lung sections showed PCE in 52%: grade 0 (48%), grade 1 (31%), grade 2 (10%), and grade 3 (10%). Matching with autopsy findings revealed that none of the cases died due to the impact of PCE. The presented data reveal a high frequency of PCE making it a notable finding-especially since not only single but also branch-like embolisms were detected. Thus, it is of great importance that none of the causes of death were related to the impact of PCE. Nevertheless, it is crucial to consider the underlying diseases for increased PCE risk and to apply latest surgical techniques and preventive measures. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary material.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 65%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,505,836
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#2,056
of 4,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,485
of 327,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#18
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,674 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.