↓ Skip to main content

Natural kinds as categorical bottlenecks

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Studies, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Natural kinds as categorical bottlenecks
Published in
Philosophical Studies, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11098-014-0326-8
Authors

L. R. Franklin-Hall

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 28%
Student > Master 4 14%
Lecturer 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 17 59%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Linguistics 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,211,562
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Studies
#251
of 1,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,268
of 226,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Studies
#5
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,274 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.