↓ Skip to main content

WARRIOR-trial - is routine radiography following the 2-week initial follow-up in trauma patients with wrist and ankle fractures necessary: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
WARRIOR-trial - is routine radiography following the 2-week initial follow-up in trauma patients with wrist and ankle fractures necessary: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0600-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikki L Weil, M Frank Termaat, Sidney M Rubinstein, Mostafa El Moumni, Wietse P Zuidema, Robert Jan Derksen, Pieta Krijnen, Leti van Bodegom-Vos, Klaus W Wendt, Cornelis van Kuijk, Frits R Rosendaal, Roelf S Breederveld, J Carel Goslings, Inger B Schipper, Maurits W van Tulder

Abstract

Extremity fractures such as wrist and ankle fractures are a common and costly healthcare problem. The management of these fractures depends on fracture type and loss of congruity of the joint, resulting in cast immobilization or operative treatment. Loss of congruity or displacement leading to uneven joint loading, osteoarthritis and an increased probability of a poor functional outcome should be identified within the first 2 weeks post-trauma, based upon radiographs to determine optimal treatment. After this period, routine radiographs are scheduled for monitoring the bone-healing process. Current protocols describe imaging at 1, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post-trauma. However, it is questionable whether routine radiography following the initial follow-up ( 2-weeks post-trauma) is cost effective. The aim of this study is to determine whether a modification of the radiographic follow-up protocol can be conducted with no worse outcome and less cost than the current standard of care for patients with a wrist or ankle fracture.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 133 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 13%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 8 6%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 46 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 13%
Sports and Recreations 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 1%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 50 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2016.
All research outputs
#20,265,771
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#5,313
of 5,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,413
of 255,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#99
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.