↓ Skip to main content

Impact of early nutrition and feeding route on outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients with shock: a post hoc marginal structural model study

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of early nutrition and feeding route on outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients with shock: a post hoc marginal structural model study
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00134-015-3730-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean Reignier, Michael Darmon, Romain Sonneville, Anne-Laure Borel, Maité Garrouste-Orgeas, Stéphane Ruckly, Bertrand Souweine, Anne-Sylvie Dumenil, Hakim Haouache, Christophe Adrie, Laurent Argaud, Lilia Soufir, Guillaume Marcotte, Virginie Laurent, Dany Goldgran-Toledano, Christophe Clec’h, Carole Schwebel, Elie Azoulay, Jean-François Timsit

Abstract

Few data are available about optimal nutrition modalities in mechanically ventilated patients with shock. Our objective was to assess associations linking early nutrition (<48 h after intubation), feeding route and calorie intake to mortality and risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in patients with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and shock.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Egypt 1 1%
Unknown 90 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Other 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Master 8 9%
Other 25 27%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 18 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,982,068
of 25,529,543 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,916
of 5,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,749
of 278,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#32
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,529,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.