↓ Skip to main content

From PALSA PLUS to PALM PLUS: adapting and developing a South African guideline and training intervention to better integrate HIV/AIDS care with primary care in rural health centers in Malawi

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From PALSA PLUS to PALM PLUS: adapting and developing a South African guideline and training intervention to better integrate HIV/AIDS care with primary care in rural health centers in Malawi
Published in
Implementation Science, July 2011
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-6-82
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael J Schull, Ruth Cornick, Sandy Thompson, Gill Faris, Lara Fairall, Barry Burciul, Sumeet Sodhi, Beverley Draper, Martias Joshua, Martha Mondiwa, Hastings Banda, Damson Kathyola, Eric Bateman, Merrick Zwarenstein

Abstract

Only about one-third of eligible HIV/AIDS patients receive anti-retroviral treatment (ART). Decentralizing treatment is crucial to wider and more equitable access, but key obstacles are a shortage of trained healthcare workers (HCW) and challenges integrating HIV/AIDS care with other primary care. This report describes the development of a guideline and training program (PALM PLUS) designed to integrate HIV/AIDS care with other primary care in Malawi. PALM PLUS was adapted from PALSA PLUS, developed in South Africa, and targets middle-cadre HCWs (clinical officers, nurses, and medical assistants). We adapted it to align with Malawi's national treatment protocols, more varied healthcare workforce, and weaker health system infrastructure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
South Africa 2 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 159 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 17%
Student > Master 27 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Lecturer 11 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 42 25%
Unknown 31 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 14%
Social Sciences 19 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Arts and Humanities 4 2%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 43 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2011.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,564
of 1,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,261
of 130,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#15
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.