You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Seasonal Changes in Metabolic Rates of Two Tropical Lakes in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecosystems, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10021-015-9851-3 |
Authors |
Ludmila Silva Brighenti, Peter Anton Staehr, Laura Martins Gagliardi, Luciana Pena Mello Brandão, Eliane Côrrea Elias, Nelson Azevedo Santos Teixeira de Mello, Francisco Antônio Rodrigues Barbosa, José Fernandes Bezerra-Neto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 58 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 21% |
Researcher | 12 | 19% |
Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
Professor | 6 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 18% |
Unknown | 6 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 24 | 39% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 31% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 8% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,725,788
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#571
of 1,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,072
of 273,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.