↓ Skip to main content

Transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy does not lead to increased risk of infectious complications

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy does not lead to increased risk of infectious complications
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00464-010-1521-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanchad C. Memark, Joel B. Anderson, Peter N. Nau, Nilay Shah, Bradley J. Needleman, Dean J. Mikami, William S. Melvin, Jeffrey W. Hazey

Abstract

It remains important to determine the risk of bacterial contamination and infectious complications of the peritoneal cavity as it pertains to transgastric natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures. The infectious implications of such procedures have been quantified in animal models. This report discusses the infectious risks of transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy (TEP) in a human clinical trial.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Unspecified 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 33%
Unspecified 2 11%
Engineering 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2011.
All research outputs
#15,236,094
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,769
of 5,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,313
of 183,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#21
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,984 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.