You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Health Benefits of Urban Nature: How Much Do We Need?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioScience, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1093/biosci/biv032 |
| Authors |
Danielle F. Shanahan, Richard A. Fuller, Robert Bush, Brenda B. Lin, Kevin J. Gaston |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 22% |
| Canada | 8 | 15% |
| United States | 7 | 13% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 84% |
| Scientists | 8 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 744 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 721 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 136 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 117 | 16% |
| Researcher | 94 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 87 | 12% |
| Other | 34 | 5% |
| Other | 122 | 16% |
| Unknown | 154 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 173 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 91 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 67 | 9% |
| Psychology | 53 | 7% |
| Design | 29 | 4% |
| Other | 134 | 18% |
| Unknown | 197 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 157. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2023.
All research outputs
#269,121
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#97
of 2,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,914
of 280,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#4
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.