↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of anthropometric measures as predictors of cancer incidence: A pooled collaborative analysis of 11 Australian cohorts

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Cancer, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of anthropometric measures as predictors of cancer incidence: A pooled collaborative analysis of 11 Australian cohorts
Published in
International Journal of Cancer, April 2015
DOI 10.1002/ijc.29529
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica L Harding, Jonathan E Shaw, Kaarin J Anstey, Robert Adams, Beverley Balkau, Sharon L Brennan-Olsen, Tom Briffa, Timothy M E Davis, Wendy A Davis, Annette Dobson, Leon Flicker, Graham Giles, Janet Grant, Rachel Huxley, Matthew Knuiman, Mary Luszcz, Robert J MacInnis, Paul Mitchell, Julie A Pasco, Christopher Reid, David Simmons, Leon Simons, Andrew Tonkin, Mark Woodward, Anna Peeters, Dianna J Magliano

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Researcher 9 13%
Professor 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 16 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Computer Science 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 21 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,041,169
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Cancer
#4,472
of 12,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,563
of 281,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Cancer
#29
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.