You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimizing the lipidomics workflow for clinical studies—practical considerations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00216-015-8633-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tuulia Hyötyläinen, Matej Orešič |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 117 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 28% |
| Researcher | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 31 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 39 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2015.
All research outputs
#17,363,471
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#5,485
of 9,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,370
of 283,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#54
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,818 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.