↓ Skip to main content

The Infant Nasopharyngeal Microbiome Impacts Severity of Lower Respiratory Infection and Risk of Asthma Development

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Host & Microbe (Science Direct), April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
664 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Infant Nasopharyngeal Microbiome Impacts Severity of Lower Respiratory Infection and Risk of Asthma Development
Published in
Cell Host & Microbe (Science Direct), April 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.chom.2015.03.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shu Mei Teo, Danny Mok, Kym Pham, Merci Kusel, Michael Serralha, Niamh Troy, Barbara J. Holt, Belinda J. Hales, Michael L. Walker, Elysia Hollams, Yury A. Bochkov, Kristine Grindle, Sebastian L. Johnston, James E. Gern, Peter D. Sly, Patrick G. Holt, Kathryn E. Holt, Michael Inouye

Abstract

The nasopharynx (NP) is a reservoir for microbes associated with acute respiratory infections (ARIs). Lung inflammation resulting from ARIs during infancy is linked to asthma development. We examined the NP microbiome during the critical first year of life in a prospective cohort of 234 children, capturing both the viral and bacterial communities and documenting all incidents of ARIs. Most infants were initially colonized with Staphylococcus or Corynebacterium before stable colonization with Alloiococcus or Moraxella. Transient incursions of Streptococcus, Moraxella, or Haemophilus marked virus-associated ARIs. Our data identify the NP microbiome as a determinant for infection spread to the lower airways, severity of accompanying inflammatory symptoms, and risk for future asthma development. Early asymptomatic colonization with Streptococcus was a strong asthma predictor, and antibiotic usage disrupted asymptomatic colonization patterns. In the absence of effective anti-viral therapies, targeting pathogenic bacteria within the NP microbiome could represent a prophylactic approach to asthma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 664 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 1%
Korea, Republic of 3 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 649 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 122 18%
Researcher 120 18%
Student > Bachelor 78 12%
Student > Master 54 8%
Other 36 5%
Other 103 16%
Unknown 151 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 121 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 112 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 89 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 78 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 2%
Other 61 9%
Unknown 191 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#890,702
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Cell Host & Microbe (Science Direct)
#619
of 2,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,867
of 280,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Host & Microbe (Science Direct)
#12
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.