↓ Skip to main content

Increased incidence of anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery in paediatric verses adult population

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increased incidence of anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery in paediatric verses adult population
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00167-017-4727-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diego Costa Astur, Charles Marcon Cachoeira, Tierri da Silva Vieira, Pedro Debieux, Camila Cohen Kaleka, Moisés Cohen

Abstract

To evaluate the anterior cruciate ligament graft failure rate in a population of 1376 patients submitted to single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure. It was hypothesized that the younger the patient, the greater the chance of a new anterior cruciate ligament graft ligament injury. A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who had SB anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between the years, 2001 and 2016, with a minimum post-operative follow-up period of 6 months. The patient population was divided into three groups, according to age: group 1-under 16 years old; group 2-between 16 and 18 years old; and group 3-older than 18 years old. Data collected included sex, laterality and graft choice data. In group 1 (under 16 years old), there were 61 primary ACL surgeries performed and 15 (24.6%) revision ACL surgeries. In group 2 (between 16 and 18 years old), there was 57 primary ACL procedures, of which 10 (17.5%) were revisions. In the group 3 (older than 18 years of age), 1258 surgeries were done with 116 (9.2%) revisions. The rate of ACL revision surgery in patients under 16 years of age was significantly higher than that found in patients older than 18 years old. When compared to the population between 16 and 18 years old, there were a higher number of failure cases, however, statistically non-significant. IV.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 22%
Other 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Researcher 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 19 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 22 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,506,823
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1,809
of 2,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,789
of 320,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#34
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.