↓ Skip to main content

The impact of initiation: Early onset marijuana smokers demonstrate altered Stroop performance and brain activation

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of initiation: Early onset marijuana smokers demonstrate altered Stroop performance and brain activation
Published in
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, April 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.03.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

K.A. Sagar, M.K. Dahlgren, A. Gönenç, M.T. Racine, M.W. Dreman, S.A. Gruber

Abstract

Marijuana (MJ) use is on the rise, particularly among teens and emerging adults. This poses serious public health concern, given the potential deleterious effects of MJ on the developing brain. We examined 50 chronic MJ smokers divided into early onset (regular MJ use prior to age 16; n=24) and late onset (age 16 or later; n=26), and 34 healthy control participants (HCs). All completed a modified Stroop Color Word Test during fMRI. Results demonstrated that MJ smokers exhibited significantly poorer performance on the Interference subtest of the Stroop, as well as altered patterns of activation in the cingulate cortex relative to HCs. Further, early onset MJ smokers exhibited significantly poorer performance relative to both HCs and late onset smokers. Additionally, earlier age of MJ onset as well as increased frequency and magnitude (grams/week) of MJ use were predictive of poorer Stroop performance. fMRI results revealed that while late onset smokers demonstrated a more similar pattern of activation to the control group, a different pattern was evident in the early onset group. These findings underscore the importance of assessing age of onset and patterns of MJ use and support the need for widespread education and intervention efforts among youth.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Student > Master 18 13%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 36 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 12%
Neuroscience 11 8%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 43 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2021.
All research outputs
#956,999
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
#63
of 1,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,904
of 279,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.