↓ Skip to main content

Green and Good? The Investment Performance of US Environmental Mutual Funds

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
193 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
315 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Green and Good? The Investment Performance of US Environmental Mutual Funds
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10551-011-0865-2
Authors

Francisco Climent, Pilar Soriano

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 315 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 63 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 5%
Researcher 14 4%
Other 52 17%
Unknown 109 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 87 28%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 87 28%
Social Sciences 15 5%
Environmental Science 5 2%
Engineering 4 1%
Other 10 3%
Unknown 107 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,409,093
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#1,174
of 2,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,837
of 109,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.