↓ Skip to main content

Intermittent Fasting: Is the Wait Worth the Weight?

Overview of attention for article published in Current Obesity Reports, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 427)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
77 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
127 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
26 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
894 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intermittent Fasting: Is the Wait Worth the Weight?
Published in
Current Obesity Reports, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13679-018-0308-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary-Catherine Stockman, Dylan Thomas, Jacquelyn Burke, Caroline M. Apovian

Abstract

We review the underlying mechanisms and potential benefits of intermittent fasting (IF) from animal models and recent clinical trials. Numerous variations of IF exist, and study protocols vary greatly in their interpretations of this weight loss trend. Most human IF studies result in minimal weight loss and marginal improvements in metabolic biomarkers, though outcomes vary. Some animal models have found that IF reduces oxidative stress, improves cognition, and delays aging. Additionally, IF has anti-inflammatory effects, promotes autophagy, and benefits the gut microbiome. The benefit-to-harm ratio varies by model, IF protocol, age at initiation, and duration. We provide an integrated perspective on potential benefits of IF as well as key areas for future investigation. In clinical trials, caloric restriction and IF result in similar degrees of weight loss and improvement in insulin sensitivity. Although these data suggest that IF may be a promising weight loss method, IF trials have been of moderate sample size and limited duration. More rigorous research is needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 127 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 894 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 894 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 205 23%
Student > Master 113 13%
Other 49 5%
Researcher 46 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 5%
Other 139 16%
Unknown 297 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 165 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 134 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 70 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 6%
Sports and Recreations 41 5%
Other 103 12%
Unknown 328 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 689. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#30,986
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Current Obesity Reports
#4
of 427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#686
of 340,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Obesity Reports
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.