↓ Skip to main content

Application of transcutaneous ultrasonography for the diagnosis of muscle mass loss in patients with liver cirrhosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastroenterology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Application of transcutaneous ultrasonography for the diagnosis of muscle mass loss in patients with liver cirrhosis
Published in
Journal of Gastroenterology, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00535-017-1378-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazufumi Kobayashi, Hitoshi Maruyama, Soichiro Kiyono, Sadahisa Ogasawara, Eiichiro Suzuki, Yoshihiko Ooka, Tetsuhiro Chiba, Naoya Kato, Tadashi Yamaguchi

Abstract

To propose an ultrasound-based parameter for the diagnosis of muscle mass loss (MML) in cirrhosis. This is an IRB-approved cross-sectional study (October 2013 to January 2017) with written informed consent including 357 subjects-234 cirrhosis and 123 controls. MML was diagnosed using the skeletal muscle index at the L3 level (L3-SMI) on computed tomography (CT). Transcutaneous ultrasound was used to demonstrate a cross section of the right iliopsoas muscle, and the iliopsoas muscle index (IP index) was defined by the iliopsoas muscle area/height(2) (mm(2)/m(2)). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic ability of IP index for MML. The iliopsoas muscle was detected in all subjects. The IP index was lower in cirrhosis than in controls: males (211.2 ± 73.8 vs. 295.5 ± 139.4, P < 0.0001) and females (200.2 ± 72.5 vs. 284.4 ± 112.4, P < 0.0001). L3-SMI and IP index showed correlations in males (r = 0.699, P < 0.0001) and in females (r = 0.707, P < 0.0001). Independent factors for MML by multivariate analysis were body mass index and IP index in both males and females. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve by IP index to detect MML were 79.5%, 73.1%, and 0.835, respectively, with the best cut-off value of 189.2 for males, and 84.6%, 78.8%, and 0.874, respectively, with the best cut-off value of 180.6 for females. Using transcutaneous ultrasound, the IP index may be a valuable diagnostic parameter for MML in cirrhosis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 14 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 17 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,483,282
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastroenterology
#937
of 1,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,376
of 318,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastroenterology
#15
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,101 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.