You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Addressing Intimate Partner Violence in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-011-1697-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin L. Ard, Harvey J. Makadon |
| Abstract |
The medical community's efforts to address intimate partner violence (IPV) have often neglected members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) population. Heterosexual women are primarily targeted for IPV screening and intervention despite the similar prevalence of IPV in LGBT individuals and its detrimental health effects. Here, we highlight the burden of IPV in LGBT relationships, discuss how LGBT and heterosexual IPV differ, and outline steps clinicians can take to address IPV in their LGBT patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 50 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 82 | 95% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | <1% |
| Georgia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 295 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 55 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 41 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 12% |
| Researcher | 33 | 11% |
| Other | 49 | 16% |
| Unknown | 53 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 83 | 27% |
| Psychology | 68 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Unknown | 65 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#474,319
of 25,802,847 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#366
of 8,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,529
of 121,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,802,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.