↓ Skip to main content

Can radiative forcing be limited to 2.6 Wm−2 without negative emissions from bioenergy AND CO2 capture and storage?

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can radiative forcing be limited to 2.6 Wm−2 without negative emissions from bioenergy AND CO2 capture and storage?
Published in
Climatic Change, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10584-012-0678-z
Authors

James Edmonds, Patrick Luckow, Katherine Calvin, Marshall Wise, Jim Dooley, Page Kyle, Son H. Kim, Pralit Patel, Leon Clarke

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 140 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 16%
Student > Master 16 11%
Professor 13 9%
Other 8 5%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 27 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 39 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 13%
Engineering 15 10%
Energy 12 8%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 37 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2015.
All research outputs
#1,331,021
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#700
of 6,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,537
of 295,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#15
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.