↓ Skip to main content

Frequent nightmares are associated with blunted cortisol awakening response in women

Overview of attention for article published in Physiology & Behavior, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Frequent nightmares are associated with blunted cortisol awakening response in women
Published in
Physiology & Behavior, May 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamás Nagy, Gyöngyvér Salavecz, Péter Simor, György Purebl, Róbert Bódizs, Samantha Dockray, Andrew Steptoe

Abstract

Nightmares are relatively common sleep complaints that seem to be associated with affective distress. To date, few attempts have been made to link nightmares to the biological markers of the stress response, and the HPA response in particular. The present study examined the relationship between frequent nightmares and the cortisol awakening response (CAR) in a cross-sectional study of working women (N=188). Analysis revealed that those who reported frequent nightmares (N = 13) showed a blunted CAR on a working day, compared to those who did not report nightmares. This result was independent of psychiatric symptoms, demographic variables, and lifestyle. Our preliminary findings suggest that decreased HPA reactivity might be a trait-like feature of women with frequent nightmares.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Researcher 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 33%
Neuroscience 7 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Physiology & Behavior
#2,029
of 5,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,466
of 279,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physiology & Behavior
#34
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.