You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Large-Eddy Simulations of Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence in Heliophysics and Astrophysics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Space Science Reviews, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11214-015-0190-7 |
| Authors |
Mark Miesch, William Matthaeus, Axel Brandenburg, Arakel Petrosyan, Annick Pouquet, Claude Cambon, Frank Jenko, Dmitri Uzdensky, James Stone, Steve Tobias, Juri Toomre, Marco Velli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 29% |
| Researcher | 17 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 41 | 59% |
| Engineering | 9 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2015.
All research outputs
#15,528,733
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#1,067
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,044
of 278,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#13
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.