↓ Skip to main content

An assessment of the foundational assumptions in high-resolution climate projections: the case of UKCP09

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An assessment of the foundational assumptions in high-resolution climate projections: the case of UKCP09
Published in
Synthese, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11229-015-0739-8
Authors

Roman Frigg, Leonard A. Smith, David A. Stainforth

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 7%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 42 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 43%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 26%
Environmental Science 12 26%
Philosophy 3 7%
Arts and Humanities 3 7%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2021.
All research outputs
#6,283,695
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#625
of 2,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,480
of 264,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#7
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.