↓ Skip to main content

The effect of excess copper on growth and physiology of important food crops: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
459 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of excess copper on growth and physiology of important food crops: a review
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11356-015-4496-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad Adrees, Shafaqat Ali, Muhammad Rizwan, Muhammad Ibrahim, Farhat Abbas, Mujahid Farid, Muhammad Zia-ur-Rehman, Muhammad Kashif Irshad, Saima Aslam Bharwana

Abstract

In recent years, copper (Cu) pollution in agricultural soils, due to arbitrary use of pesticides, fungicides, industrial effluent and wastewater irrigation, present a major concern for sustainable agrifood production especially in developing countries. The world's major food requirement is fulfilled through agricultural food crops. The Cu-induced losses in growth and yield of food crops probably exceeds from all other causes of food safety and security threats. Here, we review the adverse effects of Cu excess on growth and yield of essential food crops. Numerous studies reported the Cu-induced growth inhibition, oxidative damage and antioxidant response in agricultural food crops such as wheat, rice, maize, sunflower and cucumber. This article also describes the toxic levels of Cu in crops that decreased plant growth and yield due to alterations in mineral nutrition, photosynthesis, enzyme activities and decrease in chlorophyll biosynthesis. The response of various crops to elevated Cu concentrations varies depending upon nature of crop and cultivars used. This review could be helpful to understand the Cu toxicity and the mechanism of its tolerance in food crops. We recommend that Cu-tolerant crops should be grown on Cu-contaminated soils in order to ameliorate the toxic effects for sustainable farming systems and to meet the food demands of the intensively increasing population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 459 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 459 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 16%
Student > Master 56 12%
Student > Bachelor 52 11%
Researcher 42 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 6%
Other 67 15%
Unknown 141 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 136 30%
Environmental Science 56 12%
Chemistry 24 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 5%
Engineering 12 3%
Other 44 10%
Unknown 166 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2018.
All research outputs
#15,687,152
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#3,425
of 9,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,975
of 267,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#67
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.