↓ Skip to main content

Systematic reviews of bed rest and advice to stay active for acute low back pain.

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, October 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
217 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic reviews of bed rest and advice to stay active for acute low back pain.
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, October 1997
Pubmed ID
Authors

G Waddell, G Feder, M Lewis

Abstract

In the United Kingdom (UK), 9% of adults consult their doctor annually with back pain. The treatment recommendations are based on orthopaedic teaching, but the current management is causing increasing dissatisfaction. Many general practitioners (GPs) are confused about what constitutes effective advice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Australia 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 154 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 23%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Postgraduate 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 23 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 10%
Social Sciences 12 7%
Sports and Recreations 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 25 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,311,413
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,113
of 4,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,150
of 31,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.