↓ Skip to main content

Vermamoeba vermiformis: a Free-Living Amoeba of Interest

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vermamoeba vermiformis: a Free-Living Amoeba of Interest
Published in
Microbial Ecology, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00248-018-1199-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincent Delafont, Marie-Helene Rodier, Elodie Maisonneuve, Estelle Cateau

Abstract

Free-living amoebae are protists that are widely distributed in the environment including water, soil, and air. Although the amoebae of the genus Acanthamoeba are still the most studied, other species, such as Vermamoeba vermiformis (formerly Hartmannella vermiformis), are the subject of increased interest. Found in natural or man-made aquatic environments, V. vermiformis can support the multiplication of other microorganisms and is able to harbor and potentially protect pathogenic bacteria or viruses. This feature is to be noted because of the presence of this thermotolerant amoeba in hospital water networks. As a consequence, this protist could be implicated in health concerns and be indirectly responsible for healthcare-related infections. This review highlights, among others, the consequences of V. vermiformis relationships with other microorganisms and shows that this free-living amoeba species is therefore of interest for public health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 43 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 11%
Environmental Science 10 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 52 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,688,047
of 25,109,675 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#295
of 2,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,221
of 334,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#8
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,109,675 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.