RT @DekeArndt: Episodic announcement that: (A) recent global temperature corrections are small, and (B) the overall affect of scientists' c…
RT @DekeArndt: Episodic announcement that: (A) recent global temperature corrections are small, and (B) the overall affect of scientists' c…
RT @DekeArndt: Episodic announcement that: (A) recent global temperature corrections are small, and (B) the overall affect of scientists' c…
RT @DekeArndt: Episodic announcement that: (A) recent global temperature corrections are small, and (B) the overall affect of scientists' c…
RT @DekeArndt: Episodic announcement that: (A) recent global temperature corrections are small, and (B) the overall affect of scientists' c…
RT @DekeArndt: Episodic announcement that: (A) recent global temperature corrections are small, and (B) the overall affect of scientists' c…
RT @DekeArndt: Episodic announcement that: (A) recent global temperature corrections are small, and (B) the overall affect of scientists' c…
RT @DekeArndt: Episodic announcement that: (A) recent global temperature corrections are small, and (B) the overall affect of scientists' c…
RT @DekeArndt: Episodic announcement that: (A) recent global temperature corrections are small, and (B) the overall affect of scientists' c…
Episodic announcement that: (A) recent global temperature corrections are small, and (B) the overall affect of scientists' corrections *REDUCE* the rate of warming seen in the raw data. https://t.co/WTeuUP7vz9 https://t.co/yZOC6iIXMe
@AmyFrappier @businessinsider @NOAA @NASAGISS @metoffice I was so focused on their BI's inability to correct their chocolate extinction coverage that I forgot this more glaring error! Nice catch @AmyFrappier! Karl et al seems like a good paper to point to
@WillBracken75 Re: "NOAA altering temperature records" Yes, it's despicable how they NOAA used well-validated homogenization to REDUCE the 20th century warming trend. [/sarcasm] https://t.co/iKhYPO9e4V https://t.co/P3uEQEa2Wp
@JamesinSELA @cspanwj Eh, seems like old news but sure: https://t.co/DiuHSXWoY1
RT @bobbrand_nl: @geektrading @PaulHAMabels @fvdemocratie @thierrybaudet @telegraaf En ook, "hoe metingen tot stand zijn gekomen", wordt vo…
@geektrading @PaulHAMabels @fvdemocratie @thierrybaudet @telegraaf En ook, "hoe metingen tot stand zijn gekomen", wordt voortdurend kritisch onder de loep genomen juist in de wetenschappelijke publicaties. Bijvoorbeeld: https://t.co/YHtic07iNb https://t.co
@tibbsy07 more links to the original study: https://t.co/RPP6pOCHq1 a follow-up: https://t.co/0H2yuznWjR and some other follow-up: https://t.co/aZ72MZZgxM
@timreckmeyer @KHayhoe @desmoinesdem Actually NOAA has written about how they adjusted historical data. For example: https://t.co/ipsvef02LF
@LeighPatrick No. You clearly haven't been keeping up over the past year. https://t.co/QkSkj0kiQy
@trip6 @ReneDercksen @gjvu @klimaatVeranda @GreenOlivine @Klimaatzuster @Twundit @apvermeulen @mariejose74 @thijssen_pieter @KlaskePostma @rekenk4mer @skepticscience @IPCC_CH Tuurlijk, wéér blogstukje van een "objectivistindividualist". Ideologie. Lees gew
@ReneDercksen @gjvu @trip6 @klimaatVeranda @GreenOlivine @Klimaatzuster @Twundit @apvermeulen @mariejose74 @thijssen_pieter @KlaskePostma @rekenk4mer @skepticscience @IPCC_CH Alwéér geen wetenschappelijke publicatie voor je 'grafiekjes'? Hierbij in Science
@Benaiah_74 @piekiller65 @SenSanders Here's an article about your potentially-biased data. https://t.co/KItXHqLVJW
RT @luckytran: @NOAA The data in question? A published study in @sciencemagazine that debunked claims of a global warming "hiatus" https://…
@NOAA The data in question? A published study in @sciencemagazine that debunked claims of a global warming "hiatus" https://t.co/Zwk58eDzrM
RT @JustinTemplerSr: When reality disagrees with your beliefs, adjust your "reality"? #cognitivedissonance https://t.co/cJDJkNL60L
When reality disagrees with your beliefs, adjust your "reality"? #cognitivedissonance https://t.co/cJDJkNL60L
@cmurray862 Or this https://t.co/3DqVY67BQ0
@freethinker967 @SebDance No, you check the facts.https://t.co/hnJjq63Nij
@wowzers1372 @DeadPoo79209252 @FoxNews @HowardKurtz @MediaBuzzFNC He doesn't write papers on climate change. He's just a messenger to get science more publicity. https://t.co/bzoxrxuJQH
@JohnCoviello1 This phrase is used in Science article (Karl et al.) It refers to rate of warming over 15 years, so that is the ref. https://t.co/33E8nao1ew
@SquidBonez @EcoSenseNow Define extreme bias! I trust the science. Not sure what u read. Diff temp records all point to similar warming trend https://t.co/FPoX9wrvRj
@FriendsOScience Read the article in Science. & see this graph. Longer term trend since c 1890 is important. https://t.co/33E8nao1ew https://t.co/VN4zbBv3LQ
@EcoSenseNow @00Kevin7 @Exodus_Nixon @manny_ottawa @FriendsOScience Ok, Meantime, pause u refer to in article, well! https://t.co/33E8nao1ew
@jnvk2m @ClimateOfGavin And yet a recent celebrated paper (and one particularly vulnerable to p-hacking), https://t.co/IlyAzTQc4e
@BryanJFischer Of course it's a science issue, and of profound importance. And there was no hiatus. Look here: https://t.co/fUOH0JFb0J
@julie_kelly2 @oren_cass apologies. here is 2nd link but even abstract is behind paywall. Worth it if interested https://t.co/UzHLhwD1r5
@julie_kelly2 @oren_cass here are 2 REAL science links that may help https://t.co/UzHLhwD1r5 https://t.co/N3KFnXHaWJ
@Tom_Reilly2003 @Camburnclimate In 2015 NOAA head Tom Karl rewrote the entire temp history with a paper based on....https://t.co/92Cp3sYR6i
Then rewrite the global temperature record like Tom Karl. Voila! Hiatus gone. 2/2 https://t.co/92Cp3sYR6i
@jo_macm @altHouseScience @HouseScience From https://t.co/bpaF1Pq8Mm: "the additional weight given to the buoys". Buoy data *not* discarded.
RT @eulenspigel: Since then Tom Karl rewrote the entire global temperature record completing the curve fitting exercise. https://t.co/92Cp3…
Since then Tom Karl rewrote the entire global temperature record completing the curve fitting exercise. https://t.co/92Cp3sYR6i 2/2
@davelisterscrak @guardiannews a Well if you can't even use Google, here you go. This is fraudulent and faked ->> https://t.co/oMyBzt3Au4
RT @tri26: Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus | Science https://t.co/AdMuODflFP
Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus | Science https://t.co/AdMuODflFP
You can't make this stuff up. In 2015 NOAA **removed** satellite readings to raise the post 1998 trend.... https://t.co/VBLb0kFxcW
Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus - 1448 1469..1472 - 1469.full.pdf https://t.co/wRKY4xemD0
@DavidRoseUK @theresphysics ERSSTv4.0 paper appeared 4 Feb 2015. https://t.co/Mhh4mntGGg Karl appeared 26 June 2015 https://t.co/o5gwIR2udz
@Ker_Thad Would you like the scientific PDF version then?https://t.co/yIVEQOBdQh
Reentry at 4 for Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus https://t.co/bqU61pnn7G #paperazzi
Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus https://t.co/4OwXxrHZJv cc @L_DeWeaver
@altHouseScience @julie_kelly2 Bates says Karl paper is fine, data should only have been marked as "research" data. https://t.co/WavMEn08y3
@borenbears @newscientist The intro to Karl's study specifically cites 2013 IPCC report, then claims no longer valid https://t.co/d5GVExStzh
@DFlaherty08 look in the actual paper https://t.co/B8jsx0vvqJ though they didn't do much that is new @benshapiro @KevinIrwin3 @pittelliM
For scientists, school students or anyone who wants 2 READ the NOAA research that Bolt doesn't appear to have read https://t.co/64wTtVTqVm
(2/2) & incomplete coverage of the Arctic. See more <https://t.co/tBdDgrALSC> #journalscience #FactoftheDay #nocensorship
@ThomDartt @Mcschweety a journal article on the subject https://t.co/2BS1Ld48or
Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus https://t.co/cVBOmDEk60
@sterndavidi @hausfath @DekeArndt Heres the article. https://t.co/iuqXOes4fP
Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus https://t.co/X1oLVhGq59
.@eachus, there was no pause. #cdnpoli #abpoli #ableg https://t.co/xHBnyzf2nQ @YvanDutil @FriendsOScience
#CanIHazPDF please? https://t.co/KfOsS2M6iL
Cannot access the article, but here's: Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus https://t.co/myIDDk7oWm
New Entry at 5 Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus https://t.co/bqU61pnn7G #paperazzi
RT @IsotopeThomas: Three independent temperature records show that the oceans have been continuously warming in the past 15 years https://t…
Three independent temperature records show that the oceans have been continuously warming in the past 15 years https://t.co/IrJZTCkqG3
Disturbing! #ClimateAction Now! Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus https://t.co/NJ6N58zc47
RT @ActorAtlas: Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus https://t.co/GO7qtrMHw7 #sdg13 evidence debate
Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus https://t.co/GO7qtrMHw7 #sdg13 evidence debate
Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus https://t.co/88z3onZPaE
Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus https://t.co/4PmJjLuk3a
RT @T_Deguilhem: Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus https://t.co/a7sfpMfbt9 https://t.co/V4ITR…
Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus https://t.co/a7sfpMfbt9 https://t.co/V4ITRpDigx https://t.co/S6CBREIK44
Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus https://t.co/DZt35KfqOU
This isn’t about data falsification. It’s a paper on data correction. Pretty standard in all fields of science. https://t.co/BEktOzkpL6
@StormhunterTWN Here is a peer-reviewed case for data falsification in global temps (among many): https://t.co/qEQcQKKS5w
Hvis jeg igjen ser argumentet "#globaloppvarming har stoppet" skal jeg bare vise til denne #klima #klimaendringer https://t.co/uRBO0GhY7T
https://t.co/sAlErfuUNX Shows there is no #globalwarmingpause. "[pause is just] an artifact of earlier analyses."
@ClaudBarras @ResilientEarth @JunkScience @eachus No, it's similar to NASA. It's Fig2b here: https://t.co/d8lFUQDJaX https://t.co/8werCnUDFS
@lacalaca85 “Warming has continued…the slowdown was just an illusion” https://t.co/5i2ySJC4Yt
.@ReneDercksen Pardon? Wat is de wetenschappelijke bron van die grafieken? Ik heb u de mijne al gemeld. :-) https://t.co/wvpof9htLX
.@ReneDercksen Wetenschappelijke bron: https://t.co/wvpof9htLX
This is a good paper on temperature: Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus https://t.co/rTbtJINank
RT @aaas: From 2015, a @ScienceMagazine @NOAA article that disputes the global warming "hiatus" #TBT https://t.co/sZigx9IL4N https://t.co/o…
RT @aaas: From 2015, a @ScienceMagazine @NOAA article that disputes the global warming "hiatus" #TBT https://t.co/sZigx9IL4N https://t.co/o…