RT @aaas: From 2015, a @ScienceMagazine @NOAA article that disputes the global warming "hiatus" #TBT https://t.co/sZigx9IL4N https://t.co/o…
RT @aaas: From 2015, a @ScienceMagazine @NOAA article that disputes the global warming "hiatus" #TBT https://t.co/sZigx9IL4N https://t.co/o…
A June 2015 @ScienceMagazine @NOAA article disputes the global warming "hiatus" #TBT https://t.co/SIrQVUOYNG
From 2015, a @ScienceMagazine @NOAA article that disputes the global warming "hiatus" #TBT https://t.co/sZigx9IL4N https://t.co/o8aPXWcd4y
@NuinZeeland Dat interpoleren is tot voor kort gebrekkig gebeurd. Het kan beter, dat levert hogere T, zie https://t.co/kBgnrTnsr5
RT @MichaelEMann: Karl et al (https://t.co/olmnfAeUWX ) was an honest study. Our recent @NatureClimate commentary simply provides a differ…
RT @MichaelEMann: Karl et al (https://t.co/olmnfAeUWX ) was an honest study. Our recent @NatureClimate commentary simply provides a differ…
RT @MichaelEMann: Karl et al (https://t.co/olmnfAeUWX ) was an honest study. Our recent @NatureClimate commentary simply provides a differ…
RT @MichaelEMann: Karl et al (https://t.co/olmnfAeUWX ) was an honest study. Our recent @NatureClimate commentary simply provides a differ…
RT @MichaelEMann: Karl et al (https://t.co/olmnfAeUWX ) was an honest study. Our recent @NatureClimate commentary simply provides a differ…
RT @MichaelEMann: Karl et al (https://t.co/olmnfAeUWX ) was an honest study. Our recent @NatureClimate commentary simply provides a differ…
RT @MichaelEMann: Karl et al (https://t.co/olmnfAeUWX ) was an honest study. Our recent @NatureClimate commentary simply provides a differ…
RT @MichaelEMann: Karl et al (https://t.co/olmnfAeUWX ) was an honest study. Our recent @NatureClimate commentary simply provides a differ…
RT @MichaelEMann: Karl et al (https://t.co/olmnfAeUWX ) was an honest study. Our recent @NatureClimate commentary simply provides a differ…
RT @MichaelEMann: Karl et al (https://t.co/olmnfAeUWX ) was an honest study. Our recent @NatureClimate commentary simply provides a differ…
RT @MichaelEMann: Karl et al (https://t.co/olmnfAeUWX ) was an honest study. Our recent @NatureClimate commentary simply provides a differ…
Karl et al (https://t.co/olmnfAeUWX ) was an honest study. Our recent @NatureClimate commentary simply provides a different interpretation.
@JimFish56837379 @ClimateDepot why not read the original document before making accusations https://t.co/XPAcMpVy5K
.@GTMGQ boom. https://t.co/1KirCWyybo @WhiteRinger @kejun_7 @Tmose25
.@sluggoD54 wrong! https://t.co/OE3xqXEXsZ @Doc_Zschmidtke @Zena_2point_0 @SensiblySecular @StevePorkChop95 @angryveteran66
@PopSci @NOAA Evidence that global warming has NOT plateaued: https://t.co/dXp5fpOzG0 #COP21
Not about birds but still worth a tweet @OxfordEnvRes https://t.co/RpX2SlT3yH
@MarkGuinane That fallacy has been debunked https://t.co/aF8Uo11FNT
.@sluggoD54 nope. https://t.co/OE3xqXEXsZ @StweetsJesus @MarshallFarts5 @ZaffodB @No1TopHatFanboy @ComradeEnver
@DavidTCDavies One-year surface temps incomplete picture. And anyway not argument against action. See links I sent & https://t.co/pTaR8TAlvl
RT @ddimick: Chief of House Science Panel Picks Battle Over Climate Paper https://t.co/gsjjH4N8oI @jswatz cf. @sciencemagazine https://t.co…
RT @ddimick: Chief of House Science Panel Picks Battle Over Climate Paper https://t.co/gsjjH4N8oI @jswatz cf. @sciencemagazine https://t.co…
Chief of House Science Panel Picks Battle Over Climate Paper https://t.co/gsjjH4N8oI @jswatz cf. @sciencemagazine https://t.co/caKvaBjrkO
@lek_black @DailyMailUK is a British tabloid. And the article is wrong. https://t.co/o01gAmydNV To read the science: https://t.co/Sd89y2DzKk
.@growingwisdom "updated global surface temp analysis reveals global trends are higher than reported by the IPCC" https://t.co/ISJ0COjJ9R
Climate Science Inquiry by House: https://t.co/WgVGeDhZww & the paper https://t.co/8H0qmnvta9
@DoubleDumas I already showed him this https://t.co/OE3xqXEXsZ @sluggoD54 @No1TopHatFanboy @RepublicanRehab
.@sluggoD54 down goes sluggo! https://t.co/OE3xqXEXsZ @RepublicanRehab @MarshallFarts5 @CitizenFTW @TomBoston5 @BadAstronomer
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
#Climate: “@drvox: warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/t2iNgFbBkL bogus: https://t.co/Naaukknh2Y bogus: https://t.co/nTlQPfNip3”
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
RT @drvox: The global warming "hiatus" is … bogus: https://t.co/umg8mNKFXE bogus: https://t.co/JSprAV4SjX bogus: https://t.co/TBQPqk8ie1
@ClrView NOAA figs passed peer review in journal Science: https://t.co/Bc6rbi9BUQ: Koch-funded team analysis agrees: https://t.co/Xscz7n5Kv0
So much for "Free and unrestricted access to #climatechange data" Paper is not open access https://t.co/mj8KzX7jDj https://t.co/skHAboZ3F0
Possible Artifacts Of Data Biases In The Recent Global Surface Warming Hiatus https://t.co/VdNHWNky75
Des députés US veulent réhabiliter le hiatus climatique, démoli par un chercheur de la NOAA https://t.co/dGlSS1IFzB https://t.co/kEBmNLo8b6
Oh my...modern McCarthyism! Here's a link to the paper sparking the congressional fury. https://t.co/i1kpMHfegw https://t.co/YB5RNSd3j3
Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus. https://t.co/aNSk7HfZST
RT @sciencemagazine: Global warming hiatus may be an artifact of changing temp observation networks http://t.co/sMCMLCNVoK http://t.co/NO68…
RT @UCSEnergy: @BaronRVH I don't doubt that. Important thing is that these claims are inconsistent with the science http://t.co/jBH4PBHVjB …
@BaronRVH I don't doubt that. Important thing is that these claims are inconsistent with the science http://t.co/jBH4PBHVjB @UCSUSA
@BarbaraRKay You claim a 'hiatus'? 1998 is cherry picking! Read http://t.co/MaLF4OtpEQ #scienceishard
@ClarenceWhorley @jhinderaker I find Thomas Karl very credible http://t.co/qHp2Y32EXX
@GlobWarmHoax Dose Of Reality. No pause in Global Warming. http://t.co/mdgnufHn12
New calculated temperature increase 0.68C per 100 years. [Old 0.65C per 100 yrs] http://t.co/im2j19IP57 https://t.co/GTugo6Loyj
@ClarenceWhorley @RCScience consensus is that "hiatus" was illusion http://t.co/H7qpdV77mf. Tom Karl a very credible guy
Another depressing #climate article: New analysis no slowdown in #climatechange http://t.co/NudgNbZR0J Image: @NOAA http://t.co/lhzaoj6u3L
@miketheartist42 here, educate yourself with an actual science publication: http://t.co/N3gYJpmLMX This paper, published in June, debunks u.
"@freakonometrics: "Possible artifacts of data biases in the (.)global surface warming hiatus" http://t.co/v4s331xYGs http://t.co/VS5p9fTvWm
No "slowdown" of global warming #CCS @eptntnu @zeronorge @COP21 http://t.co/RQZsPWd8a5
No "slowdown" of global warming #CCS @eptntnu @zeronorge @COP21 http://t.co/RQZsPWd8a5
No "slowdown" of global warming #CCS @eptntnu @zeronorge @COP21 http://t.co/RQZsPWd8a5
You've argued strongly for a "pause." Well, beyond this:http://t.co/rIiA6YkMzJ and far more fundamental, is https://t.co/fTST2OtGKM @curryja
No slow down in global #warming, NOAA researchers say in new Science paper http://t.co/fgsikghim9 #climate http://t.co/sXr3wH96dx
Correction of previous data analysis show that no slowdown of global warming occurred from 1998-2015. http://t.co/9VroaZlKzX
[Report] Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus http://t.co/hrv65EzQGr
[Report] Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus http://t.co/xQ1OCLBDdD
@quovadisweblog @hellahueck dat is-ie ook niet, is ook zo'n FUD-onderwerp, zie http://t.co/QMP9SR3N1k & https://t.co/iX6TJG98Z2
Correction of previous data analysis show that no slowdown of global warming occurred from 1998-2015. http://t.co/9VroaZlKzX
Correction of previous data analysis show that no slowdown of global warming occurred from 1998-2015. http://t.co/9VroaZlKzX
There was no “hiatus” in global warming. Illusion is an artifact of previous studies http://t.co/9pyHCVxk2n via @sciencemagazine
Its gettin hot here http://t.co/nwcL0OQ5pU
yawn, but "Updated global surface temperature data do not support a global warming hiatus" Karl et al., in Science http://t.co/3XXCTWIXft
yawn, but "Updated global surface temperature data do not support a global warming hiatus" Karl et al., in Science http://t.co/3XXCTWIXft
No pause or slowdown. New Science analysis: global surface temperature trends are higher than reported by IPCC. http://t.co/UnRxoR9Vw5
@GalileoMovement Updated ocean temperatures http://t.co/jt6XYPlK2i
@__Alasdair__ Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus http://t.co/6l13tkoKZo
@boaomega22 @atheistic_1 what hiatus? http://t.co/CfSpcmXf2N
Science strikes back. http://t.co/txprtUMnPz http://t.co/3xNmJTnJ2z
@PCS1776 The pause has already been disproved. Do try to keep up. http://t.co/ZTusgyMl9O @LeahNTorres
@savillj013 NOAA report that #globaltemperature actually increased over last 15 years. Claim no #hiatus or #pause http://t.co/J5fyyKgBIG
Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus http://t.co/Q3QTkGGnv2
http://t.co/up9q8Efmt0 There was no global warming blip
El estudio 'Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus' en http://t.co/CpvDkT8TOA vía @sciencemagazine
El estudio 'Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus' en http://t.co/CpvDkT8TOA vía @sciencemagazine