↓ Skip to main content

Effect of χ-casein glycomacropeptide on gastrointestinal motility in dogs

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, July 1983
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of χ-casein glycomacropeptide on gastrointestinal motility in dogs
Published in
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, July 1983
DOI 10.1007/bf00833026
Authors

E. Ya. Stan, S. D. Groisman, K. B. Krasil'shchikov, M. P. Chernikov

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 1990.
All research outputs
#8,064,660
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine
#179
of 1,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,391
of 8,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,357 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them