You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Solutions to Common Problems in Training Learners in General Internal Medicine Ambulatory Settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Medicine, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.05.023 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
G. Dodd Denton, Margaret C. Lo, Suzanne Brandenburg, Susan Hingle, Lauren Meade, Shobhina Chheda, Sara B. Fazio, Melvin Blanchard, Andrew Hoellein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 22% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Librarian | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2015.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Medicine
#6,471
of 7,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,869
of 279,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Medicine
#51
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.