↓ Skip to main content

Micropropagation of adult Stone Pine (Pinus pinea L.)

Overview of attention for article published in Trees, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Micropropagation of adult Stone Pine (Pinus pinea L.)
Published in
Trees, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00468-009-0325-0
Authors

Millán Cortizo, Nuria de Diego, Paloma Moncaleán, Ricardo Javier Ordás

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 49 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Master 8 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 14%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2012.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Trees
#111
of 562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,149
of 96,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trees
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 562 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.