You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A micro circulating PCR chip using a suction-type membrane for fluidic transport
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biomedical Microdevices, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10544-008-9242-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liang-Ju Chien, Jung-Hao Wang, Tsung-Min Hsieh, Ping-Hei Chen, Pei-Jer Chen, Da-Sheng Lee, Ching-Hsing Luo, Gwo-Bin Lee |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 12 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Energy | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Microdevices
#237
of 755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,706
of 92,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Microdevices
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 755 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.