↓ Skip to main content

The creation of an in vitro gemplasm collection of yam (Dioscorea spp.) for genetic resources preservation

Overview of attention for article published in Euphytica, January 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The creation of an in vitro gemplasm collection of yam (Dioscorea spp.) for genetic resources preservation
Published in
Euphytica, January 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00022573
Authors

B. Malaurie, O. Pungu, R. Dumont, M-F. Trouslot

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 61%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Euphytica
#329
of 1,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,601
of 62,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Euphytica
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,140 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.