↓ Skip to main content

Colon-Targeted Oral Drug Delivery Systems: Design Trends and Approaches

Overview of attention for article published in AAPS PharmSciTech, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 1,507)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
patent
32 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
303 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
721 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Colon-Targeted Oral Drug Delivery Systems: Design Trends and Approaches
Published in
AAPS PharmSciTech, June 2015
DOI 10.1208/s12249-015-0350-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seth Amidon, Jack E. Brown, Vivek S. Dave

Abstract

Colon-specific drug delivery systems (CDDS) are desirable for the treatment of a range of local diseases such as ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic pancreatitis, and colonic cancer. In addition, the colon can be a potential site for the systemic absorption of several drugs to treat non-colonic conditions. Drugs such as proteins and peptides that are known to degrade in the extreme gastric pH, if delivered to the colon intact, can be systemically absorbed by colonic mucosa. In order to achieve effective therapeutic outcomes, it is imperative that the designed delivery system specifically targets the drugs into the colon. Several formulation approaches have been explored in the development colon-targeted drug delivery systems. These approaches involve the use of formulation components that interact with one or more aspects of gastrointestinal (GI) physiology, such as the difference in the pH along the GI tract, the presence of colonic microflora, and enzymes, to achieve colon targeting. This article highlights the factors influencing colon-specific drug delivery and colonic bioavailability, and the limitations associated with CDDS. Further, the review provides a systematic discussion of various conventional, as well as relatively newer formulation approaches/technologies currently being utilized for the development of CDDS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 721 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 718 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 14%
Student > Master 94 13%
Student > Bachelor 90 12%
Researcher 57 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 4%
Other 91 13%
Unknown 257 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 189 26%
Chemistry 47 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 5%
Other 89 12%
Unknown 286 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,696,939
of 23,572,442 outputs
Outputs from AAPS PharmSciTech
#17
of 1,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,346
of 266,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS PharmSciTech
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,572,442 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,507 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.