Title |
Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Autism-Specific Workplace Tool for Employers: A Randomised Controlled Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10803-018-3611-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Melissa Scott, Marita Falkmer, Torbjörn Falkmer, Sonya Girdler |
Abstract |
A randomised controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of the Integrated Employment Success Tool (IEST™) in improving employers' self-efficacy in modifying the workplace for individuals on the autism spectrum. Employers (N = 84) were randomised to the IEST™ or support as usual groups. Measurements of self-efficacy, knowledge and attitudes towards disability in the workplace were obtained at baseline and post-test. Results revealed a significant improvement in self-efficacy within the IEST™ group between baseline and post-test (p = 0.016). At post-test, there were no significant differences between groups in relation to self-efficacy in implementing autism-specific workplace modifications and employer attitudes towards disability in the workplace. Given the lack of significant outcomes, further research is needed to determine the effectiveness of the IEST™ for employers. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry #ACTRN12614000771651, registered 21/7/2014. Trial URL https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=366699 . |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 20% |
Chile | 1 | 10% |
Canada | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 185 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 38 | 21% |
Researcher | 22 | 12% |
Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
Other | 32 | 17% |
Unknown | 47 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 39 | 21% |
Psychology | 27 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
Other | 20 | 11% |
Unknown | 56 | 30% |