You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
“Little Science, Big Science” and a History of Science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Igaku Toshokan/Journal of the Japan Medical Library Association, January 1992
|
| DOI | 10.7142/igakutoshokan.39.297 |
| Authors |
Nagayasu SHIMAO |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
#6,848,228
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Igaku Toshokan/Journal of the Japan Medical Library Association
#1
of 36 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,414
of 61,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Igaku Toshokan/Journal of the Japan Medical Library Association
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one scored the same or higher as 35 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them